How Iran’s oil was nationalised

Recently I came across a remarkable book entitled Patriot of Persia – Muhammad Mossadegh and a Very British Coup. Written by Christopher de Bellaigue, it is simply brimming with interesting details. For the major part of the last 100 years, until the revolution launched by Ayatollah Khomeini, the people of Iran have had a pretty raw deal. What is worse, they continue to be treated by the West as the pariahs of the Middle East. Iran, the land of Cyrus the Great, was the home of one of the world’s grand civilisations. Nevertheless, Sir Harold Nicolson – British diplomat and author of 24 books, among which was the oft quoted Diplomacy published in 1939 – had the most disparaging things to say about the country and its people. To an extent he helped to mould public opinion in Whitehall and influenced British foreign policy towards that country. Born in Tehran, he was posted as British charge d’affairs to Iran in 1923. The Persians were always treated with a certain aloof condescension, as if nobody wanted to touch them with a barge pole. The problem was that they had something that the West wanted. And this meant that the country was ripe for plunder.

Top of the list of exploiters were Britain and Russia. In 1907, when the two countries made a deal to divide Iran into ‘spheres of influence,’ it was apparent to the rest of Europe that what the British were after was Persian oil. At the outbreak of the First World War, one of England’s top racist politicians Winston Churchill, (who years later tortured President Barack Obama’s grandfather in Kenya,) had secured for Britain a majority shareholding in the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. This yielded for London twice the revenue that accrued to Tehran. To the American political observer, it certainly looked as if the land of the once great Achaemenid Empire was being administrated from Whitehall for the benefit of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company.

Iran was governed between the two World Wars by a brutal and hardnosed dictator named Reza Khan who established the Pahlavi dynasty. Under his ruthless rule the people of Iran suffered great hardship and poverty. Fortunately for the masses, he decided to flirt with the Nazis which hastened his swift departure into exile. The British then installed his son who was quite happy to honour the existing oil treaty and with the help of the CIA, spawned the dreaded secret police known as Savak, who at its peak had 60,000 agents. While Tehran became the Paris of the East, people in the rest of the country groaned under the capricious rule of the Shahenshah. Then the aristocrat Muhammad Mossadegh arrived on the scene. ‘Iranian oil is for the Iranians’ he maintained. Mossadegh was scrupulously honest and incorruptible. Bellaigue narrates a charming story of the time when Mossadegh’s wife was arrested for driving the wrong way down a one-way street. When she protested to him, he telephoned the chief of police and ordered him to promote the constable who had arrested her.

The Shah was not amused. In 1940, Mossadegh spent five months in solitary confinement. By 1949 anti-British sentiment had reached fever pitch. The results of a shamelessly rigged election were rejected by the nationalists. The Shah, still acting under British orders, appointed an army general as prime minister who rejected the demand for nationalisation. The fellow was promptly assassinated by the Warriors of Islam. Finally Mossadegh took over, nationalised Persian oil, was removed from power in a CIA plot, incarcerated and exiled. When an objective history of modern Iran is written he will be remembered as Iran’s greatest nationalist.

Do Pakistanis Need Reasons to Complain?

By Mushtaq Panjwani

I live in Hong Kong but spend about half my time travelling, mostly in Asia and the Middle East. I also visit Pakistan at least twice a year. It’s a fact that most people, within Pakistan or outside it, do not have a positive outlook towards life. They complain more and compliment less. They whine about imperfections and take the good stuff for granted. They are always thinking about what they don’t have and are never grateful for what they do have. As a result, they are unhappy and miserable most of the time. Unfortunately, that’s how most people choose to live their lives.

But during my last week in Karachi I felt that my fellow Pakistanis might be beating everyone else in terms of whining and complaining. Everyone seems to be on a mission – to share bad news and spread gloom and doom. Here are their top three complaints and my take on them:

1. Everything is so expensive; making a living is extremely difficult; poverty is at its peak; life is tougher than ever. Here’s what I see:

* Every restaurant is packed, whether it’s Butler’s Chocolate Café that sells 500-rupee coffee, or BBQ Tonite which has now expanded to three floors, or Al Sajjad at the Creek that plans to double its capacity from 1,000 to 2,000 this month. You’d say these are for the rich. Earlier in July, I was in Kharadar. The 16-rupee bun-kabab thela has expanded to a mini café and was more crowded than ever. A poor guy can still eat a full meal for Rs 20 or less.

* All flights are full, both domestic and international. We couldn’t get a confirmed seat for Skardu. Again, if you think that doesn’t represent the common people, check the trains and buses from Karachi to other cities and provinces – there are more services than ever and still more crowded than ever. How can so many people afford to travel?

* A friend of mine has been looking for drivers for his office and maasis (domestic helpers) for the home for months now, but can’t get anyone despite the high salaries he is willing to pay. Where are all the jobless people?

* What used to be luxuries for most middle-class people just a few years ago seem to have become necessities now – mobile phones for kids, cars, air-conditioners in apartments, Wi-Fi Internet access and expensive schools, but many still seem to be living beyond their means, and complaining.

2. We don’t even have basic facilities like electricity; power failures are at their worst. Here’s what I see:

* Fact: The amount of electricity generated per year has gone up from 77 billion kw to 91 billion kw in five years! The official consumption has remained consistent at 72 billion kw. So what’s the explanation? A huge amount of electricity is consumed illegally, not just by people with connections, but also by the common public.

* Nobody seems to be bothered about conserving power: air-conditioners and lights are left on when not used; unnecessary lighting is used at most weddings and parties and the list goes on.

* Most retail outlets open around noon and stay open till late night, not fully utilising the daylight.

* Considering the above, a few hours of power shutdowns each day should be expected. It seems that most areas experience loadshedding at specified hours daily – much better than the indefinite shutdowns that I remember from a few years ago.

3. Traffic conditions are bad; there’s no development. Nothing can be farther from the truth, as I see it:

* I see new roads and flyover bridges every time I visit Karachi. I see traffic conditions improving and travel time shortening between many parts of the city.

* Anyone who doesn’t like traffic should move from big cities to small towns, or stay at home. Traffic is part of development and a sign of progress. How would you feel if the roads were empty?

Yes, we do have issues in our country, but playing the blame game won’t help anyone. What would help is a positive perspective on the issues, an attitude of responsibility, some focus on finding solutions to problems, taking action on things that are in our control and most importantly gratitude for what we do have.

Why Hosni Mubarak Is Still Better Than Pakistani Rulers

By Ahmed Quraishi

Hosni Mubarak in his speech a few minutes ago has proven he and his regime, including his new Vice President, do not understand and respect their people.

But there is one thing he said that resonated with me because I’ve seen it in his government for the past three decades.

I’d like to point out this one thing because it is very relevant to Pakistan’s political and military leaderships.

Mubarak said at one point in his speech, ‘I will not allow myself to be subject to foreign interference’. At another place, he added, ‘I will live and die in Egypt.’

Great words and they certainly don’t justify his three-decade long tight grip on power, the corruption and now the refusal of the regime to understand its people.

But I watched President Mubarak say these words and thought about Pakistani leaders who, since the 1990s and until now in 2011, have become shameful instruments of foreign meddling in Pakistan. Mubarak is supposed to be a bigger foreign stooge and yet he never allowed foreign meddling in his country, and he won’t now even in his defeat.

Even in his defeat Mubarak declared he will not subject himself to foreign diktat. And that he will die and be buried in Egypt and won’t escape for safety and in some haven in Jeddah, Dubai, London and New York.

For Pakistan’s ruling elite, these cities have become alternate capitals of Pakistan.

Mubarak refused to entertain offers to move to Germany or Saudi Arabia or Dubai. Sure, things can change in the future, but I read in the Arabic-language media that if worse came to worse, Mubarak thinks he could hand over power and move to his house in the resort city of Sharm el Sheikh, but never leave and die outside Egypt.

This is significant and let me explain why.

Even when Egypt under Mubarak was very pro-American and pro-Israel, it kept its national pride. Egypt was taking American aid but refused to accept American meddling. Mubarak knew Washington needed his country in order to protect Israel. So he delivered on that count but never permitted the Americans to meddle in Egyptian politics. When President George W. Bush rolled out his democracy agenda in the Middle East after 9/11, Mubarak was instrumental in failing it [along with the Saudis]. He just won’t have it. Mubarak refused to allow the Americans to establish direct contact with Egyptian politicians or engineer any kind of internal change.

Egypt made peace with Israel but only because Egyptian nationalists were disappointed at what they saw as stabs in the back by Arabs and Muslims [For example, rich Arabs refused to bail oput Egyptian economy enough despite Egypt fighting Israel in four wars on behalf of all Arabs. Egypt was also shocked to see Pakistan in 1956 supporting the British-French-Israeli invasion of Egypt, and other Muslim nations like Turkey and Iran not supporting Egypt in wars with Israel.] All of this shaped the psyche of the Egyptian ruling elite and intelligentsia and helped push Egypt toward peace with Israel under American guarantees.

But Mubarak didn’t allow his people to become American or Israeli puppets, and limited all forms of political interference.

I can recount many occasions when there were frictions between Cairo and Washington over one thing or the other and the mainstream US media was unleashed – as usual – to ridicule, harass or intimidate Mubarak and Egypt. But Mubarak won’t have any of it. The Egyptians have always been very protective of their national pride.

Compare that to Pakistan. Every regime, from Benazir Bhutto to Nawaz Sharif to Pervez Musharraf to Asif Zardari, has handed over Pakistani citizens to foreign governments without an iota of national pride.

Some of them moved to Jeddah, Dubai, London and New York. Most of them have their wealth and properties abroad. Mr. Musharraf added something new to this shameful history when he launched Pakistan’s first political party on foreign soil, in London and Dubai. And now most Pakistani politicians consider it kosher to conduct important political meetings outside Pakistan. Mr. Zardari has introduced another first: high-level meetings with foreign governments that relevant Pakistani government departments, like the Foreign Office, know nothing about. We have ambassadors and national security advisers who are appointed to protect the interests of foreign governments.

The regime’s corruption and ruthlessness are the reasons why Egyptians want change. But Egypt progressed a lot under Mubarak’s regime, unlike the Syrians or the Iraqis.

For all of his ties to the Americans and Israelis, Egypt under Mubarak remained staunchly proud. As a Pakistani, I certainly don’t want to see a Mubarak in Pakistan. However, we do need a Pakistani ruling class with the same sense of pride and history, one that won’t turn its country into an experimentation zone for foreign powers.

Hosni Mubarak and the Egyptian regime made peace with Israel but never allowed any foreign power to come and abuse Egyptians or bomb them through CIA drones. This honor exclusively belongs to Pakistan’s ruling elite.

Egypt: Exchanging a Dictator for a Torturer

By James Ridgeway

As it now stands, the United States appears content to contemplate exchanging Hosni Mubarak for Egypt’s new Vice President, Omar Suleiman, the Egyptian spy master–that is, one dictator for another– to maintain the status quo. Of course, Israel must sign off on this deal, assuring the U.S. that Egypt can remain as its main base in the region, straddling as it does North Africa and the Middle East. Without it, the U.S. would most definitely have to rethink its entire neo-colonial policies in the region.

As for Suleiman, he looks to be a nasty piece of work. Agence France Press has pulled together the basics:

For US intelligence officials, he has been a trusted partner willing to go after Islamist militants without hesitation, targeting homegrown radical groups Gamaa Islamiya and Jihad after they carried out a string of attacks on foreigners.A product of the US-Egyptian relationship, Suleiman underwent training in the 1980s at the John F. Kennedy Special Warfare School and Center at Fort Bragg in North Carolina….

After taking over as spy director, Suleiman oversaw an agreement with the United States in 1995 that allowed for suspected militants to be secretly transferred to Egypt for questioning, according to the book “Ghost Plane” by journalist Stephen Grey…

In the run-up to the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, the CIA relied on Suleiman to accept the transfer of a detainee known as Ibn Sheikh al-Libi, who US officials hoped could prove a link between Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda.The suspect was bound and blindfolded and flown to Cairo, where the CIA believed their longtime ally Suleiman would ensure a successful interrogation, according to “The One Percent Doctrine” by author Ron Suskind. A US Senate report in 2006 describes how the detainee was locked in a cage for hours and beaten, with Egyptian authorities pushing him to confirm alleged connections between Al-Qaeda and Saddam.Libi eventually told his interrogators that the then Iraqi regime was moving to provide Al-Qaeda with biological and chemical weapons.When the then US secretary of state Colin Powell made the case for war before the United Nations, he referred to details of Libi’s confession.The detainee eventually recanted his account.

Thus our loyal ally Egypt provided the fake information used by the United States to go to war in Iraq.

Stephen Soldz, co-founder of the Coalition for an Ethical Psychology, pulled together the following excerpts from authors who have discussed Sulieman.

Jane Mayer, in The Dark Side, pointed to Suleiman’s role in the rendition program:

Each rendition was authorized at the very top levels of both governments….The long-serving chief of the Egyptian central intelligence agency, Omar Suleiman, negotiated directly with top Agency officials. [Former U.S. Ambassador to Egypt] Walker described the Egyptian counterpart, Suleiman, as “very bright, very realistic,” adding that he was cognizant that there was a downside to “some of the negative things that the Egyptians engaged in, of torture and so on. But he was not squeamish, by the way” (pp. 113).

Stephen Grey, in Ghost Plane, his investigative work on the rendition program, also points to Suleiman as central to the program:

To negotiate these assurances [that the Egyptians wouldn't "torture" the prisoner delivered for torture] the CIA dealt principally in Egypt through Omar Suleiman, the chief of the Egyptian general intelligence service (EGIS) since 1993. It was he who arranged the meetings with the Egyptian interior ministry…. Suleiman, who understood English well, was an urbane and sophisticated man. Others told me that for years Suleiman was America’s chief interlocutor with the Egyptian regime — the main channel to President Hosni Mubarak himself, even on matters far removed from intelligence and security.

Suleiman’s role in the rendition program was also highlighted in a Wikileaks cable:

the context of the close and sustained cooperation between the USG and GOE on counterterrorism, Post believes that the written GOE assurances regarding the return of three Egyptians detained at Guantanamo (reftel) represent the firm commitment of the GOE to adhere to the requested principles. These assurances were passed directly from Egyptian General Intelligence Service (EGIS) Chief Soliman through liaison channels — the most effective communication path on this issue. General Soliman’s word is the GOE’s guarantee, and the GOE’s track record of cooperation on CT issues lends further support to this assessment. End summary.

“Shortly after 9/11, Australian citizen Mamdouh Habib was captured by Pakistani security forces and, under US pressure, torture by Pakistanis,” writes Soldz. “He was then rendered (with an Australian diplomat watching) by CIA operatives to Egypt, a not uncommon practice. In Egypt, Habib merited Suleiman’s personal attention. As related by Richard Neville, based on Habib’s memoir”:

Habib was interrogated by the country’s Intelligence Director, General Omar Suleiman…. Suleiman took a personal interest in anyone suspected of links with Al Qaeda. As Habib had visited Afghanistan shortly before 9/11, he was under suspicion. Habib was repeatedly zapped with high-voltage electricity, immersed in water up to his nostrils, beaten, his fingers were broken and he was hung from metal hooks. That treatment wasn’t enough for Suleiman, so:

To loosen Habib’s tongue, Suleiman ordered a guard to murder a gruesomely shackled Turkistan prisoner in front of Habib – and he did, with a vicious karate kick.

After Suleiman’s men extracted Habib’s confession, he was transferred back to US custody, where he eventually was imprisoned at Guantanamo. His “confession” was then used as evidence in his Guantanamo trial.

Israel primed for war on Iran: Netanyahu deputy

Israel is primed for a war on Iran, a deputy to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday, in a rare break with his government’s reticence as world powers try to talk Tehran into curbing its nuclear plans.

Israeli soldiers carry their comrade on a stretcher as they run during a training session at their base near the southern city of Ashdod, October 29, 2009.

By spearheading assaults on guerrillas in neighboring Lebanon and Palestinian territories, the Israeli air force had gained the techniques necessary for any future strikes on Iranian sites, Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon said.

“There is no doubt that the technological capabilities, which improved in recent years, have improved range and aerial refueling capabilities, and have brought about a massive improvement in the accuracy of ordnance and intelligence,” he told a conference of military officers and experts.

“This capability can be used for a war on terror in Gaza, for a war in the face of rockets from Lebanon, for war on the conventional Syrian army, and also for war on a peripheral state like Iran,” said Yaalon, a former armed forces chief.

Israel, which is assumed to have the Middle East’s only atomic arsenal, bombed Iraq’s nuclear reactor in 1981 and launched a similar sortie in Syria in 2007.

But its veiled threats against foe Iran have been questioned by some independent analysts who see the potential targets as too distant, dispersed, numerous and well-defended for Israeli warplanes to take on alone.

Israel’s leaders rarely use the term “war” while publicly discussing how to deal with Iran, in whose often secretive uranium enrichment, long-range missile projects and hostile rhetoric the Jewish state sees a mortal threat.

OPTIONS OPEN

Officially endorsing efforts by U.N. Security Council powers to step up sanctions against Tehran, which denies having hostile designs, Netanyahu and other senior Israeli officials usually speak obliquely of a need to “keep all options on the table.”

Two other senior Israeli officials said U.S.-led diplomatic pressure should be given a chance. But they voiced misgivings.

“I believe that, by the middle of June, there will be international sanctions that will be watered down, with very low chances of being effective,” Defense Minister Ehud Barak told a closed-door parliamentary committee, according to a spokesman.

“With that said, there is nevertheless importance to such sanctions, because the delay has only served Iran,” he said, adding: “It is very possible that there will be other, more effective sanctions by a specific set of European countries.”

Dan Meridor — another deputy prime minister who, like Yaalon and Barak, belongs to Netanyahu’s inner council — sought to play down Israel’s particular interest in having Iran reined in, calling it a global challenge.

“If in the end of the day, Iran does get nuclear, in spite of what America says and wants, this will have grave implications for world order, the balance of power and the rules of the game,” Meridor told foreign journalists in Jerusalem.

In his address to the Fisher Institute for Air & Space Strategic Studies, Yaalon said Israel was in a proxy war with Iran due to its sponsorship of Lebanon’s Hezbollah guerrillas and the Palestinian Islamic movement Hamas.

“There is no doubt, looking at the overall situation, that we are already in a military confrontation with Iran,” he said. “Iran is the main motivator of those attacking us.”

India’s ‘Kyrgyz plan’ for Pakistan

by: pakalert

RAW was created in the late sixties with one purpose, to destabilize Pakistan. Its first target was East Pakistan. Its second target was Bangladesh. In 1971 RAW was successful in creating the Mukti Bahni, recruiting 80,000 Hindus and then sending them into Muslim Bengal disguised as Pakistani soldiers. They exacerbated a bad situation and created a Civil War. RAWs second target was Bangladesh. The Rakhi Bahni was imposed on Bangladesh with a sitting Bharati General in charge. The first success in East Pakistan was reversed on August 14th, 1975 when Bangladeshi patriots killed the Indian agent and left his body to rot in the streets for a week. Bangladesh tore up the “Treaty of Friendship” which would have allowed Delhi to first reduce Bangladesh into a Bhutan and then take it over like Sikkim. Though December 16th 1971 is taught to Bharati citizens as a huge achievement, August 14th, 1975 is ignored.

The Bangladeshi scenario is reported by Barrister M.B. Munshi in his seminal book titled “The Indian Doctrine”.

Indian intelligence: “‘the aim of RAW is to keep internal disturbances flaring up and the ISI preoccupied so that Pakistan can lend no worthwhile resistance to Indian designs in the region.”

RAW used the same model to take over Sikkim and then created the LTTE with an aim to bifurcare and eventually take of Sri Lanka. Similar palns were hatched to destabilize Nepal, and Maldinves. Bharti forces were sent to Lanka and Maldives-but had to withdraw. Bhutan today faces the same intrigues.

Then down through the years RAW continued its operations in all neighboring countries. India supported President Dawood’s grandiose extraterritorial ambitions in the 1970s. Using the Mukti Bahni model, Bharat tried to use sabotage in Pakistan during the USSRs occupation of Afghanistan. On the wrong side of history, Bharat did not condemn the invasion-instead it supported the Soviets and allied itself with the KGB,KHAD and blew up market places and civilian hospitals. One of RAWs greatest ignominious achievements were murdering 300 people in Bhori Bazaar Karachi with a bomb. While the world condemned the bombing, Delhi cheered.

India’s dark shadow on Afghanistan. After 9/11, Bharat re-established its presence in Kabul and used its Consulates and projects to send mercenaries across the border. It has been doing this for a decade. The purpose of these attacks is to break up Pakistan into pieces with docile friendly mini-states. This is the wet dream of most Bharatis-one taught to them in temples, and one that is reinforced in their worldview by the Hindu Mahasabah.

Christina Palmer describes the nefarious activities on both sides of the Khyber Pass. Today the RAW activities continue in Pakistan.
Listing of Indian RAWs bomb blasts in Pakistan
“India supporting the terrorists in tribal areas & Balochistan” FM Qureshi
Indian Commanders grill MI Chief over Intel failure in Azm-e-Nau
RAW Chief directed to create Kyrgyzstan like scenario in Pakistan
Agency asked to fund protestors in Pakistan over loadshedding, price hike issue
180 million dollars approved for smuggling Pakistani wheat to Afghanistan to create flour crisis across Pakistan
RAW also given an unspecified and un-auditable amount for organizing suicide bombing in Pakistan
MI Chief praised for Afghanistan performance but snubbed for failure on intel about Pakistan Army’s joint exercises with PAF
RAWs trail of terror: Indian Bomb blasts in Pakistan

RAW Page: Indian Intelligence Services

NEW DELHI-Some more details of the 2-day special conference of the commanders of the joint Forces of India that ended here yesterday have surfaced.

Highly credible defiance sources revealed that on the last day of the conference, the participants where appreciated the Military Intelligence Chief General Loomba there they showed their utmost resentment over his failure in pre-empting the Pakistan Army’s Joint execrates with Pakistan Air Force, code named Azm-e-Nau that are in full swing at the moment. Chairman, Chiefs of Staff Committee Air Chief Marshal P V Naik grilled the MI Chief general Loomba for not collecting the sufficient intelligence about the ongoing war exercises’ of Pakistan Army. The sources say that Loomba completely failed to give any reasonable intelligence output to the participants the war games that the Pakistanis were conducting in the southern part of the Punjab Province of their country.

The sources say that the Chief of top spy agency the Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW) K C Verma was the one who stole the show on the day-2 of the conference as he not only got immense commendation by the participants for his briefing on operations in Pakistan and China but also managed to grab the endorsement for the approval of a huge amount of funds for future operations in Pakistan and China.
India a secret player in Afghanistan: Bases-Lashkargarh, Qushila Jadid,Khahak,Hassan Killies
RAW facts on South Asia- India fails to occupy countries
The TTP is a RAW agency: The Indian LTTE against Pakistan

The sources say that the RAW Chief was directed by the commanders to create Kyrgyzstan like situation in Pakistan and must exploit Pakistan’s internal crisis like the energy crisis, the price hike etc. The RAW chief apprised the participants that his agency had already started work in this direction. He disclosed to the participants that his agency was already in touch with certain elements in Pakistan to fund the anti-government protests over the constant power outage and jobless youth was being engaged on daily wages basis for the purpose. He further briefed the participants that at least the three foreign Independent Power Producers (IPPs) were already paid handsome amount of money for producing less electricity while Pakistan Power Minister was already helping the agenda as he was himself engaged in prolonging to power crisis so that he can bring in rental power projects that could earn him highly lucrative kickbacks.
Anatomy of Indian Intelligence Services and Alliances
RAW facts on South Asia- India fails to occupy countries.
LTTE was created by India
Indian sponsored Tamil terror in Sri Lanka continues unabated
Lanka: Indian LTTE terrorists use youth as cannon fodder
Lanka Letter: RAW THE RASCAL by Prem Raj in Columbo
Pakistan Sri Lanka growing military alliance
Growing Pakistan Sri Lanka ties

The RAW boss also briefed the participants that an amount of 180 million US dollars had already been disbursed amongst certain drug leaders in Afghanistan to smuggle out Wheat from Pakistan to Afghanistan by the start of month of May so that the flour crisis could be generated at the same time to destabilize the State. He further sought the recommendation for an unspecified amount for organizing suicide bombings and sectarian clashes across Pakistan while a similar recommendation was sought for creating unrest in China’s Xinjiang province via Afghanistan by funding and patronizing East Turkistan Islamic Movement( ETIM). He assured the participants that his agency was fully capable of creating Kyrgyzstan like situation in Pakistan and it was just a matter of time and money upon which he got full endorsement of the commanders. More details of the last day’s proceedings are likely to follow shortly. Daily Mail Post. From Christina Palmer
BLA – A threat to international peace by Ahmad Shah Baloch: “The BLA is the creation of Indian intelligence agencies, which are trying to create instability in the areas bordering Iran and Afghanistan.”. Expose on RAW by Isha Khan of Dhaka Bangladesh
RAW facts on South Asia- India fails to occupy countries
India intelligence: “‘the aim of RAW is to keep internal disturbances flaring up and the ISI preoccupied so that Pakistan can lend no worthwhile resistance to Indian designs in the region.”
Dhaka Diary: RAW 2008: An Instrument of Indian Imperialism by Isha Khan Dhaka Bangladesh. In typical “baghal main churi, moun men ram ram” fashion, the Indian delegation first hides the fact that the RAW agents are funding and arming the BLA and supporting suicide bombings by anti-Pakistan elements in the USA. BLA – A threat to international peace by Ahmad Shah Baloch: “The BLA is the creation of Indian intelligence agencies, which are trying to create instability in the areas bordering Iran and Afghanistan.”. Expose on RAW by Isha Khan of Dhaka Bangladesh. The delegation then only discusses the bombing of the Indian “embassy” (which was a military base run by the notorious “Brigadier Mehta” and his band of merry men.