Posts Tagged ‘washington’

OBL Resurfaces On 9/11 Anniversary

September 13, 2011

WASHINGTON – A private intelligence monitoring service says al-Qaida is marking the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks with an hour-long video, just released on Jihadist websites.

Site Monitoring Services says the video features an audio speech by the new leader, Egyptian Ayman al-Zawahri, as well as previously unreleased footage of former leader Osama bin Laden. The 62-minute video, titled “The Dawn of Imminent Victory,” was posted on jihadist forums on Monday. Zawahri is shown in a still photo.

U.S. intelligence officials say Zawahri tops their hit list after the killing of bin Laden by U.S. Navy SEALs in Pakistan in May.

The U.S. was on high alert during the weekend over what officials described as a credible but unconfirmed terror threat on Washington or New York.

OBL Resurfaces On 9/11 Anniversary

September 13, 2011

WASHINGTON – A private intelligence monitoring service says al-Qaida is marking the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks with an hour-long video, just released on Jihadist websites.

Site Monitoring Services says the video features an audio speech by the new leader, Egyptian Ayman al-Zawahri, as well as previously unreleased footage of former leader Osama bin Laden. The 62-minute video, titled “The Dawn of Imminent Victory,” was posted on jihadist forums on Monday. Zawahri is shown in a still photo.

U.S. intelligence officials say Zawahri tops their hit list after the killing of bin Laden by U.S. Navy SEALs in Pakistan in May.

The U.S. was on high alert during the weekend over what officials described as a credible but unconfirmed terror threat on Washington or New York.

Our troubled relations with USA

August 22, 2011

By Inayatullah

The statements made by Defence Secretary Leon Panetta and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the National Defence University, in Washington, clearly bring out the nature of relations between America and Pakistan. That there have been complaints and grievances on both sides is known for quite some time. To mention two of the points causing strains: One, relating to the increasingly frequent drone attacks causing civilian casualties, and the other about the demand to start operations in North Waziristan. That mistrust had been growing between the two allies was well demonstrated in the conditions attached to the Kerry-Lugar-Burman Act, and how the GHQ objected to certain requirements, which directly impinged on the authority of the armed forces command.

Add to it, the expansion of the US Embassy’s activities in Pakistan, and the induction of hundreds of Americans under different guises; the dramatic Raymond Davis episode that exposed the existence of clandestine American operations on the ground in our country; and the extraordinary efforts made by the Obama government at the highest level to secure the CIA contractor’s release, added to the already anti-American sentiment among the people of Pakistan. The unilateral attack on a building in Abbottabad to capture and kill Osama bin Laden without even informing the Pakistani authorities shocked the government and the people, and voices were raised about the violation of the country’s sovereignty. Statements that more raids could and would be carried out against high-value Al-Qaeda targets, added insult to the injury. A little later came another disturbing news: The US government was withholding $800 million, which were to be imbursed to the military for the operations being carried out.

Presently, there is quite a long list of Washington’s grievances against Islamabad. Besides a number of lingering points of difference and unfulfilled expectations, a number of irritations have also surfaced. For instance, the restrictions placed on the movements of the diplomatic staff. There is also the dispute about the number of visas to be issued to the Americans other than ordinary visitors to the country. The recent abduction of an American (who, according to the Punjab Home Minister, was involved in “mysterious” activities) is another instance of happenings, which is bound to increase the strained relationship. But the latest item added to the American complaints is the accusation that Pakistan let the Chinese have access to the wreckage of the crashed Stealth helicopter for examination.

Reverting to the remarks made by Hillary and Panetta at the National Defence University, while the former appreciated the complexity of the US-Pakistan relationship and showed an understanding of the position taken by Pakistan, the latter’s articulation was direct and characteristically blunt. Mark their words: Hilary Clinton: “I think the Pakistanis have a viewpoint that has to be shown some respect: Are you going to be with us or not? Because you (USA) keep in, you go out (meaning Washington walking away after the Soviet exit from Afghanistan)…..Well, they are partners, but they don’t always cooperate with us on what we think is in their interests.” And said Panetta: “What makes this (partnership with Pakistan) complicated is that they have relationships with the Haqqanis, and the Haqqani tribe are going across the border and attacking our forces in Afghanistan…….it is clear that there is a relationship there…….There is a relationship with Lashkar-i-Taiba. And you know this is a group that goes into India and threatens attacks there; it has conducted attacks there.” “The Pakistanis,” he added, “were also refusing to provide visas to American citizens. And yet there is no choice, but to maintain relationship with Pakistan. Why? Because we are fighting a war there. Because we are fighting Al-Qaeda there, and they do give us some cooperation there….…(also) because they do represent an important force in that region. Because they do happen to be a nuclear power that has nuclear weapons, and we have to be concerned to what happens to those nuclear weapons…….we have got to maintain a relationship with Pakistan. And it is going to be complicated. It is going to be ups and downs.”

Now a few more words from Hillary: “It is not like we are coming to Pakistan, and encouraging to do things that will be bad for it, but they (Pakistanis) often don’t follow what our logic is as we make those cases to them, so it takes a lot of dialogue…….We think it is very much in America’s interest, we think it is in the long-term interests of Pakistan to work through what are very difficult problems in that relationship.”

Here it is relevant to refer to the reported question and answer session held by US Spokesperson Victoria Nuland with a view to clarifying the remarks of Clinton and Panetta. At this press briefing, the Indian (Washington-based) journalists raised the issue that after Panetta’s statement, the US should declare Pakistan a State that sponsors terrorism. Nuland said “no” to the suggestion if she believed Secretary Panetta was accusing the Government of Pakistan of having ties to the (mentioned) two terrorist groups. This is how she viewed the accusation: “I think Secretary Panetta spoke to our concern about how these two organisations operate and any relationship that they may have with Pakistan.……which is a different issue than a State being a sponsor of terrorism itself.”

The purpose on my part for citing these extensive quotes is to spell out for the readers the real thinking of Washington about Pakistan’s attitude and behaviour with respect to what it should be doing to pursue the American agenda. These statements, therefore, have a lot of value for us to ponder over the rationale of the differences that have developed overtime in our relationships.

It seems that time has come when we must arrive at a clear understanding of the current situation and the surrounding facts – the escalating US-India partnership and its implications, the complex element of the Afghanistan endgame, and the American designs in Pakistan. And this, keeping in view, the awful political, economic and administrative conditions in Pakistan, the calibre and capacity of the federal ruling elite, and especially the collapse of governance in parts of the country.

The situation urgently demands the political parties and GHQ to deliberate the nature and complexities of the current US-Pakistan relationship, and come to a clear and firm stand. This should be followed by taking steps to open a dialogue with the USA at various levels. It is surprising, if not baffling, to find that while the Americans of all kinds keep coming to talk and influence our policymakers, we confine ourselves to infrequent visits by the army officers and after long intervals someone from the Foreign Office. Why not send some of our experienced and bright parliamentarians to carry bipartisan messages to their counterparts in Washington. It is a folly to leave this job of mutual education to our diplomatic (official) mission and a paid lobbyist. Let parliamentarians, media luminaries, professionals, professors and civil society leaders go to Washington and other vital centres, and engage influential Americans to help them clearly comprehend our position and points of view.

USA assures support to Pakistani Gays, Lesbians and Trans-genders

July 5, 2011

ISLAMABAD: The US Embassy has arranged the first ever gay, lesbians and transgender pride celebration ceremony in Islamabad and assured its participants that Washington would continue to support their cause here in Pakistan.

untitled.JPG

The US Embassy issued a press release on June 26 in which it made it public that Charge d’ Affaires Ambassador Richard Hoagland, and members of Gays and Lesbians in Foreign Affairs Agencies (GLIFAA) hosted Islamabad Embassy’s first ever gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) Pride Celebration on June 26.

It further states that this gathering demonstrated continued US Embassy support for human rights, including GLBT rights, in Pakistan at a time when those rights are increasingly under attack from extremist elements throughout Pakistani society.

Over 75 people including mission officers, US military representatives, foreign diplomats, and leaders of Pakistani GLBT advocacy groups attended the ceremony. In formal remarks, the charge d’ affaires underscored President Obama’s May 31, 2011 GLBT Pride Proclamation: “We rededicate ourselves to the pursuit of equal rights for all, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity”.

Addressing the Pakistani GLBT activists, the charge d’ affaires, while acknowledging that the struggle for GLBT rights in Pakistan is still beginning, said: “I want to be clear that the US Embassy is here to support you and stand by your side every step of the way”.

Al Qaeda Exposes Itself By “Confirming” CIA’s Hoax At Abbottabad

May 9, 2011

“The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaeda. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US . . .” — Pierre-Henri Bunel [Former French artillery and intelligence officer]

Truth-seekers around the world have found another self-revealing lead. Reuters reports that ‘Al Qaeda’ has “confirmed” that “bin Laden died in Abbottabad operation”.

According to the Reuters report (excerpts):

“Al Qaeda confirmed the death Osama bin Laden Friday in an Internet message that vowed revenge on the United States and its allies, including Pakistan, according to the SITE monitoring service” [Echoing exactly what CIA Director Panetta said a few days back, strange isn't it? Since when has the CIA been assessing proper intel?]

“We call upon our Muslim people in Pakistan, on whose land Sheikh Osama was killed, to rise up and revolt to cleanse this shame that has been attached to them by a clique of traitors and thieves … and in general to cleanse their country from the filth of the Americans who spread corruption in it.”

This is a huge blunder made by the so-called ‘Al Qaeda’. They actually acknowledge the fake “recent killing” of Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, thereby indirectly giving credibility to the Obama Administration, Pentagon and CIA.

Let us analyse how after the OBL hoax, we have Israel’s intelligence Mossad losing its control on propagation of proper formulated disinformation. First of all, if the ‘Al Qaeda’ was ever a real jihadi organisation, it would have known that Osama bin Laden had actually died about a decade ago.

WHY BIN LADEN DIED ABOUT A DECADE AGO

> Dr. Steve Pieczenik, a senior US government insider, former CFR member, former subordinate to Henry Kissinger and James Baker to name a few and who still serves in the Department of Defense mentioned 9 years ago and recently again in an interview that a top General of the Paul Wolfowitz squad revealed back then that Osama bin Laden had been killed at Tora Bora and that 9/11 was a false-flag operation [Source]

> Former CIA Middle East case officer-turned writer Robert Baer had stated in a 2008 interview to Terry Gross in the latter’s show Fresh Air on National Public Radio that bin Laden is long dead and that his alleged videos can be easily manipulated.

He also went on to say:

“He hasn’t shown up, I’ve taken in the last month a poll of CIA officers who have been on his trail, and what astounded me was not a single one was sure he was alive or dead. They have no idea, I mean this man disappeared off the side of the earth.”

Baer also warned that the war is shifting into Pakistan, a dangerous precedent that could see the vaguely defined conflict move anywhere. [Source]

> Dr. Steve Pieczenik had revealed in his April 2002 interview that he worked with Osama bin Laden in 1978 and 1981 and the latter “had kidney disease. As a physician, knew that he had to have two dialysis machines and he was dying” Pieczenik told Jones during the April 24, 2002 interview.

Pieczenik then stated that the video tape of a fat Bin Laden look alike “taking responsibility” for 9/11 that was released in December 2001 was “such a hoax” designed to “manipulate” people in the emotional aftermath of 9/11.

The subsequent war in Afghanistan that followed 9/11 was orchestrated “With the agreement of the bin Laden family, knowing fully well that he would die,” said Pieczenik. “And I think that Musharraf, the President of Pakistan, spilled the beans by accident three months ago when he said that bin Laden was dead because his kidney dialysis machines were destroyed in East Afghanistan.”

> Add to this a statement by CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta who gave his professional assessment of bin Laden’s medical condition based on the videotape broadcasted by al Jazeera on December 27, 2001. He explained that bin Laden’s ghastly appearance – “grayness of beard, paleness of skin, very gaunt sort of features” – is often associated with chronic kidney failure or renal failure. He also noted that bin Laden couldn’t move his left arm probably due to a stroke because people suffering from kidney failures have a higher risk for stroke. Dr. Gupta pointed out that dialysis machines require electricity, clean water and a sterile environment to function properly. Without an operational machine, a patient could only survive for less than a week.

> An Egyptian paper posted on December 26, 2001, ran an obituary on Osama bin Laden whose death resulted from lack of proper medical care for “serious lung complications.” A Taliban official told the Pakistan Observer that he saw bin Laden’s face before the burial in Tora Bora where some members of bin Laden’s family, friends and al Qaeda fighters gathered for his funeral. Asked whether he could pinpoint the spot where bin Laden was buried, he answered, “I am sure that like other places in Tora Bora that particular place too must have vanished,” implying that it was obliterated by U.S. aerial bombing.

> According to Washington Post (Oct. 28.2002), the Arabic-language al-Majallah obtained bin Laden’s will from a “very reliable” source in Afghanistan. The will – typed, signed by bin Laden and dated December 14, 2001- includes verses of Koran and the words of a man “who appeared desperate and on the verge of death.”
The link to the Washington Post piece was originally:

Which has been removed for obvious reasons

> Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University’s Religious Studies program had joined Kevin Barrett on his radio show (gcnlive.com, 2/16/2007, first hour) in his first public interview since comments he made in 2006 indicating that he believes Bin Laden may be dead and that many of the newer tapes are either fake or consist of old audio and video.
The “Confession” video, played ad infinitum in the wake of the attack on Afghanistan in December 2001, was magically found in a house in Jalalabad after anti-Taliban forces moved in. It featured a fat Osama laughing and joking about how he’d carried out 9/11. The video was also mistranslated in order to manipulate viewer opinion and featured “Bin Laden” praising two of the hijackers, only he got their names wrong.


Real Bin Laden (left), Fake Mossad “bin Laden” (right)

This Osama also uses the wrong hand to write with and wears gold rings, a practice totally in opposition to the Muslim faith.


Men wearing gold is considered strictly “haram” (prohibited) in Islam

Despite the fact that the man in the video looks nothing like Bin Laden, the CIA stood by the video whilst many, including Professor Lawrence now, have declared it an outright fake.

Lawrence is the author of a book entitled Messages to the World: The Statements of Osama Bin Laden, which translates Bin Laden’s writing. In January 2006 he told ABC news that a newly released audio tape was missing several key elements and “was like a voice from the grave”. The Professor had analyzed more than 20 complete speeches and interviews of the al Qaida leader for his book, and, while the CIA confirmed the voice on the tape as Bin Laden, Lawrence questioned when it was recorded and declared the timing of its release as politically convenient.

> One of Osama’s sons Omar bin Laden in a video strongly suggested that the videos of bin Laden emerging after 2001 seem fake.

> In May 2009, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari confirmed that his “counterparts in the American intelligence agencies” hadn’t heard anything from Bin Laden in seven years and confirmed “I don’t think he’s alive” [whereas he shamefully retracted a few days back after CIA's new feed]

> In November 2, 2007, former Pakistani PM Benazir Bhutto told David Frost of Al Jazeera in an interview while speaking of people who threaten her “Omar Saeed Sheikh, the man who murdered Osama bin Laden”

> Benazir Bhutto gets assassinated just a few days later on December 27, 2007 (after her revelation of Osama being long dead)

WHY THE CIA WOULD HAVE KILLED BIN LADEN

The CIA has a habit of recruiting assets and then disposing of them once their objectives are fulfilled. If you want to be aware of your history, you should know that during Afghan jihad when the CIA was looking for Saudi intelligence representatives for jihad, one of them was codenamed “Tim Osman” who met Michael Riconosciuto and FBI’s Theodore Gunderson in 1986 at the Hilton Hotel in Sherman Oaks, California to procure a sizeable cache of advanced weapons. ‘Tim Osman’ was none other than Osama bin Laden himself.

See the declassified FBI file here

Later on, as many might have surely read over the years, the Bin Laden family started to severe ties with the Bush family (who were good friends). The personal hatred might have forced George Bush Jr. and Dick Cheney to order the CIA to send in a double-agent to kill Bin Laden. You have read the varying statements above. According to my intel reports, Osama bin Laden was killed in 2002 (early) at Tora Bora by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who tricked him into accompanying him “to get safe haven in Pakistan”. He was killed right then.

Whichever narrative is true, the one thing we all agree upon is that Osama bin Laden died about a decade ago during the aerial carpet-bombing at Tora Bora by the USAF.

Bin Laden would most probably have been killed for the reason that he clearly mentioned in a detailed interview to Pakistani daily Ummat newspaper on 28 September 2001: “I am not responsible for 9/11, I have no knowledge of it. Killing innocent men, women and children is prohibited in Islam”

In short, what I can gather is that the Bush administration needed to subvert and frame Osama bin Laden and hold him accountable for whatever attacks and terrorism the US would commit since 2001 in the name of “retaliation”. For this, the real Osama had to be killed and replaced by a fake and rather fatty duplicate, who recorded videos most probably in some Hollywood-type studio with the CIA as Directors and Israeli Mossad as Producers.

The continuation of the OBL “boogeyman” in the form of duplicate bin Ladens (plastic surgery galore!) was to give justification for American presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. The US is already extracting oil from Iraq and engaged in depopulation of the Arabs there. In Afghanistan however, they are facing continuous defeat at the hands of the Afghan Taliban who have recently promised “the most ferocious guerilla attacks to date” dubbed as ‘Operation Badar’ from May 1 onwards. Plus, Barack Obama had to divert attention from his birth certificate issue and the fact that his “proof” was also dubbed as fake by major intelligence agencies of the world who said his birth certificate is a “rank forgery”.

The “recent killing” of Osama bin Laden (really?) has benefited the US administration in every way:

1) Now that “the man” is dead, the US can run out from Afghanistan before being buried in the Graveyard of Empires (Afghanistan) like the Soviets

2) The “birther” issue behind Obama now quite diverted

3) Obama’s re-election campaign

4) Targeting Pakistan’s strategic nuclear assets

5) Declaring Pakistan’s ISI as a “terrorist organisation” as lobbied by India and Israel

6) Alleging presence of more “Al Qaeda leaders” in Pakistan. Recently, Jewish senator Carl Levin even went a step ahead to claim “Pakistan also knows the whereabouts of Mullah Omar”

7) Trying to lure Pakistan back into American dependency since Pakistan was the central state in fomenting good ties with China and Saudi Arabia on increased strategic cooperation. Analyst and historian Dr. Webster Tarpley Ph.D in an interview to Russia Today said that the CIA hoax at Abbottabad was staged to target Pakistan for its China and Saudi ties. Recently, Saudi Arabia had bought advanced nuclear-capable missiles from China with the assistance of Pakistan’s military establishment. Dr. Tarpley further mentioned that the next false-flag after this hoax at Abbottabad will be staged by the CIA to target the ISI and “prove” it as a “terrorist outfit”

HISTORY OF AL QAEDA

A few interesting things to share:

> BBC News reported on 8 December 2002:

“Officials from the Palestinian Authority have accused the Israeli spy agency Mossad of setting up a fake al-Qaeda terrorist cell in Gaza. Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat said that Israel had set up the mock cell in order to justify attacks in Palestinian areas.”

Also, Executive Intelligence Review reported on 20 December 2002:

“The United States government has been provided with concrete evidence that the Israeli Mossad and other Israeli intelligence services have been involved in a 13-month effort to “recruit” an Israeli-run, phony “al-Qaeda cell” among Palestinians, so that Israel could achieve a frontline position in the U.S. war against terrorism and get a green light for a worldwide “revenge without borders” policy. The question: Does the United States have the moral fiber to investigate?”


Mossad agents arrested by the Palestinian Authority (2002)

> The FBI lists Adam Yahya Gadahn as a most wanted Al Qaeda operative.

Interestingly, Adam Pearlman is his real name. Adam is the grandson of the late Carl K. Pearlman; a prominent Jewish urologist in Orange County. Carl was also a member of the board of directors of the Anti-Defamation League, which was caught spying on Americans for Israel in 1993, much as AIPAC has been caught up in the more recent spy scandal.

> In 2004, Times Online reported: Abu Qatada boasted to MI5 that he could prevent terrorist attacks and offered to expose dangerous extremists, while all along he was setting up a haven for his terror organisation in Britain….Among the scores of young militants who came to visit him in London was the chief suspect in the Madrid train bombings. His followers also included people who wanted to be suicide bombers for al-Qaeda, such as Richard Reid, the shoe bomber…. Instead, MI5 agents held three meetings with the cleric, who bragged of his influence among young Islamic militants and insisted that they were no risk to Britain’s national security.

> Al Qaeda in Iraq:

The BBC reported on 12/5/2002:

“The two British operatives, arrested by Basra police and later freed by a British military operation, were identified by the BBC as “members of the SAS elite special forces” . They were disguised by wigs and Arab dress. Iraqi sources reported that the Iraqi police were watching the two, and when they tried to approach them they shot two policemen and tried to escape the scene”

Original link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/424614.stm (apparently removed)

> Israeli Al Qaeda in the Phillipines, as reported by The Manila Bulletin Online on 18 June 2004:

“Philippine National Police (PNP) operatives apprehended an Israeli suspected to be a member of the al-Qaeda terror network in in Baguio City on June 7″

Original link: http://www.mb.com.ph/PROV2004061411759.html (apparently removed, archived here)

> Adil Hadi Al Jazairi bin Hamlili, the Al Qaeda terrorist responsible for several terror attacks in Pakistan including a powerful bomb blast at a hotel in Karachi in 2004 turned out to be an MI6 double agent [Source]

> BBC’s award-winning documentary “The Power of Nightmares” [Watch]

> FBI engineers Al-Qaeda terror plot, builds fake bomb, creates real terrorist [Watch]

> Press TV reported on 23 June 2009 that Qari Zainuddin Mehsud, former terrorist-turned whistleblower revealed that the ‘Pakistani Taliban’ (TTP) who are allied with Al Qaeda is “pursing a US and Israeli agenda, backed by both American and Israeli intelligence agencies”. He was assassinated by the TTP a few days later. [Watch his confession here]

CONCLUDING REMARKS

There should be no atom of doubt left that ‘Al Qaeda’ is actually a joint worldwide group of assassins and terrorists who are controlled by the CIA, MI6 and MOSSAD. All three have vested interests spearheaded by their governments:

1) The US wants extended access to oil reserves such as those in Libya and Iraq

2) Israel wants to hasten the race to their dream of a “Greater Israel”

3) The British want to revive their colonial/imperial stronghold over their territories

Pakistan is the next target. The pace is on road to World War III, with much accreditation to the corporate media networks in the West spreading disinformation and propaganda which is sadly picked up by local news agencies in Pakistan also.

The “confirmation” by the fraud Al Qaeda of Osama’s “recent death” is enough to show whose interests they serve and where the message is coming from.

The prime objective: De-nuclearization of Pakistan and making it subservient to India.

ON A LIGHTER NOTE >

First, they said “Obama and top officials were watching the raid live in the Situation Room”

Later the CIA chief says “there was a 25 minute blackout during which the live feed from cameras mounted on the helmets of the US special forces was cut off”

Questions:

1. What were they watching then, for which they posed so heroically?

2. How can they prove they killed “Osama bin Laden” in Abbottabad?

Historic bloopers of world’s best spy agencies

May 9, 2011

LAHORE: While a debate is currently under way around the world on the intelligence failure of even the best spy agencies to arrest Osama bin Laden for around a decade, history shows that the Central Investigation Agency (CIA) of the United States, the MI-6 of Britain, former Soviet Union’s KGB, Mossad of Israel and the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) of India etc have not only committed monumental blunders, but at times, their slip-ups have proved extremely costly to their respective nations.

As far as the CIA is concerned, this is what The Washington Post had observed about it on December 5, 2007: “The history of the CIA is littered with spectacular intelligence mistakes. Sometimes, the correction of one error can lead to a new error, as analysts atone for past mistakes by moving too far in the opposite direction.”

In his article “The CIA’s Biggest Bloopers,” published in The Washington Post on the above-mentioned date, writer Michael Dobbs analysed CIA’s six decades of intelligence gathering by compiling a ‘Fact Checker’ list.

According to this article, the biggest CIA goof-ups include its 1956 prediction proving wrong that Moscow would remain in full control of Eastern Europe through 1960 at least, its incorrect estimates in 1958 that the Soviet Union would have 500 intercontinental missiles in 1961 or 1962 and its failure to inform President Kennedy in 1961 that a planned invasion of Cuba through 1,500 Cuban exiles had little chance of success without the participation of US forces and then of course.

As the article mentions, in August 1978, during the Iranian Revolution, the CIA had wrongly estimated that Iran was not in a revolutionary or even pre-revolutionary situation. The estimates proved faulty when the Shah of Iran had to flee his country just six months later.

Similarly, on July 31, 1990, the CIA had incorrectly dismissed the likelihood of an Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, which Saddam Hussein invaded just two days later. The CIA had also significantly underestimated the scale of the Iraqi nuclear weapons programme.

In May 1998, the CIA had failed to predict the testing of an Indian nuclear bomb, though it was better prepared for the first Pakistan nuke tests a few days later.

In September 1999, the CIA once again came up with a flawed intelligence forecast that Iran could test an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of hitting US territory in the next few years.

Times proved that Iran was nowhere near to attaining this capability.

In 2002, the CIA said Iraq possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction and that it was not far from making a nuclear bomb if it had the necessary fissile material. This turned out to be yet another lie and a pretext of attacking Iraq.

This article somehow missed out how the CIA had over-estimated the power of the Warsaw Pact of 1955, not anticipating that the treaty was about to dissolve.

A study of the Korean War reveals that the CIA had also committed two major blunders during this famous battle of 1950 by underestimating the threat of a North Korean invasion of South Korea and failing to predict the intervention of the Chinese troops until a day before it had actually happened.

The above quoted article had also overlooked how the CIA, established in 1947, had also fallen short of analysing or predicting the then Egyptian President Anwar Sadat’s move to attack Israel in 1973.

It also failed to mention how this premier US spy agency had planned ineffective security measures for its Beirut station chief William Buckley, who was abducted and murdered in 1984.

In fact, CIA was unable to locate Buckley before his murder.

After Buckley’s murder, President Reagan had issued a national security directive, whereby use of both covert action and military force was authorised in the war against Islamic guerrilla groups in the Middle East and Northern Africa.

The security directive had also justified the use of force against Libya in 1986 when the CIA claimed that the Libyan government was responsible for the attack on a nightclub in Berlin.

The bombing of Libya led to a terrorist attack on Pan American Flight 103 two years later, causing death of nearly 300 people.

Melvin Goodman, a Soviet analyst at the CIA, had once said in an interview: “The CIA should admit that it exaggerated the strength of the Soviet military and economy, and that it underestimated the burden of Soviet defence spending on the country’s economy.”

Goodman also pointed out that the CIA had ignored Gorbachev’s efforts to urge the United States to come to the peace table and to discuss disarmament.

Interestingly, the CIA had also failed to anticipate the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Kabul in 1989.

It goes without saying that in 2001, the CIA failed to provide information on the terrorist acts of September 11 on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon.

Similarly, it had also failed to warn the Bush administration before Operation Desert Storm that Iraq had stored Sarin nerve gas.

According to The Los Angeles Times edition of March 16, 1997, “In 1995, French intelligence publicly humiliated the CIA when it exposed a US spy operation designed to steal secrets from French trade negotiators. That economic intelligence operation was apparently compromised when a female officer was identified by French intelligence.”

Leading Indian magazine Outlook in its March 1997 edition also mentions an incident where the CIA deputy station chief for India was arrested and expelled after attempting to recruit Ratten Sehgal, who was the additional director in the Intelligence Bureau.

In his book ‘The Legacy of Ashes’, celebrated author Time Weiner has viewed that CIA had failed to predict every big international event from the outbreak of the Korean War to the fall of the Berlin Wall and the 9/11 attacks.

A review of Weiner’s book published by the British daily The Daily Telegraph on July 29, 2007 read: “The CIA thought it had an intelligence coup on its hands in 1994.

Its friends in the Guatemalan military were bugging the bedroom of Marilyn McAfee, the American ambassador in that country, whom they regarded as suspect because she was fighting human rights abuses by the regime.

Eavesdroppers heard her whispering sweet nothings to someone whom they took to be her secretary, another female diplomat – and the CIA set out to undermine Mrs McAfee by spreading rumours in Washington that she was a lesbian.”

The newspaper had further stated: “There was just one problem. The ambassador, who was happily married, was not having an affair with her secretary. The secret microphones had instead recorded her “cooing endearments” to Murphy, her poodle”.

The mistake is just one example of bungling by the CIA chronicled in a new history of the agency by the Pulitzer prize-winning author, Tim Weiner, who has covered intelligence matters for The New York Times for two decades.”

The Daily Telegraph had earlier published a similar article on this subject on January 5, 2006.

The writers of this article, Messrs Anton La Guardia and Alec Russell, had actually discussed a book ‘State of War:

The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration’ by a New York Times reporter James Rise.

Analysing the content of this book, The Daily Telegraph staffers had asserted, “Botched CIA operations may have handed Iran vital information on how to make nuclear weapons and betrayed the identities of America’s spies in the country, according to a new book on US intelligence. The latest account of American intelligence failures includes details of how the CIA allegedly tried to slip Teheran some Russian designs for an atomic bomb, which contained hidden flaws that would have made any device inoperable.”

“The Iranians, however, were tipped off by the very agent sent to give them the documents.”

They went on to write, “In a separate incident, the book claims a CIA officer mistakenly sent an Iranian agent – who turned out to be a double agent – information that was used to arrest virtually all of the agency’s spies in Iran.”

The Sunday Times, yet another leading British daily, had written on February 5, 2010 on how a missionary family’s plane was ‘mistakenly’ shot down over Peru in a 2001 CIA blunder, killing two people on board.

The newspaper wrote, “After nine years of investigation, however, the CIA insisted that none of its officers had acted inappropriately when the aircraft was mistakenly attacked as part of a covert anti-drug effort.”

According to a BBC report of May 13, 1999, “The unintentional bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade has not only gravely damaged NATO’s diplomacy, but has also seriously undermined the American Central Intelligence Agency, the CIA, which has been blamed for wrongly targeting the embassy.”

The BBC had viewed, “The Belgrade attack was just the latest in a series of high-profile blunders by the CIA. In the last two years alone, the agency has somehow failed to spot India and Pakistan’s intentions to explode nuclear devices and wrongly identified a pharmaceuticals factory in Sudan as a chemical weapons plant.”

Coming to MI-6, the 101-year old British secret service, which happens to be the oldest spy agency in the world, it has often been held responsible in public discussions for the 1982 fiasco of the Falkland. This war between Argentina and the United Kingdom was fought over the disputed Falkland Islands, South Georgia Islands and the South Sandwich Islands.

A peek through Professor Keith Jeffrey’s book ‘The Secret History of MI6′ shows how MI-6, the world’s most storied foreign intelligence service, had also failed during the 1930s to provide an analytic assessment of Adolf Hitler’s intentions in Europe. The book asserts that the outbreak of World War II had also caught this agency off-balance.

The dreaded Israeli spy agency Mosad, established in 1949, is no exception when it comes to committing irreversible blunders.

According to the Al-Jazeera TV, the assassination of a senior Hamas commander Mahmoud Mabhouh in Dubai on January 19, 2010 had proved to be a watershed moment in the long history of the Mossad.

A report on the noted Arab television stated, “Israeli officials who ordered the assassination did something that Zionists have always done, underestimate their Arab opponents. Israel has traditionally used its technological superiority and prowess over Arabs to operate freely in the Middle East. But the technology of surveillance and intelligence is now available to most governments, and even ordinary citizens can assume the classic roles once reserved for characters in spy novels.”

The report said, “The assassination team in Dubai did not expect that their pictures would be plastered all around the world, and that their names (in their real passports) would be circulated on Interpol’s (“Red Notice”) Wanted List.

The assassins did not think that the Dubai security officers would be capable of operating security cameras, retrieving the data therein and piece together how 26 of their agents were able to carry out the hit on commander Mabhouh.”

The history of Israeli intelligence failures is pretty old though. In 1954, the Egyptian regime had unearthed a network of Egyptian Jewish spies who were engaged in terror attacks on British and US targets in Egypt.

When the Egyptian government tried these spies in court, Israeli media claimed that Cairo was hatching conspiracies against Tel Aviv.

The Egyptians proved right and the operation was such a debacle that it led to the eventual resignation of Pinhas Lavon, the then Israeli defence minister.

While the Mossad hunters were chasing the alleged perpetrators of the attack on Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics, they killed two innocent people, both of whom had nothing to do with the 1972 Olympics attacks.

Mossad had also failed to accurately estimate Hezbollah’s capabilities during the Lebanon War of 2006.

It never succeeded in killing a single Hezbollah regional or national leader and in what could be termed a classic case of mistaken identity Mossad kidnapped a poor Lebanese farmer because his name was Hassan Nasrallah (the namesake of the Hezbollah chief) who had nothing to do with the Lebanese paramilitary organization.

On June 8, 1967, Israel mistakenly attacked a United States Navy technical research ship called USS Liberty, killed 34 crewmembers and wounded 170.

At the time of the 75-minute attack, the ship was sailing in international waters north of the Sinai Peninsula. Both the Israeli and US governments conducted inquiries and issued reports that concluded the attack was a mistake.

This is what ‘The Los Angeles Times’, had stated in its October 12, 1997 edition: “Mossad is no longer the agency of legend.

Terrorism, and the fear and sudden death associated with it, have created the impression that the Mossad is merely a kind of hit team that tracks, hunts down and executes Palestinian terrorists. Its intelligence-gathering skills have accordingly suffered. The question is whether today’s Israel needs to reinvent the Mossad or reclaim its original mission.”

Tracking a few huge mistakes committed by the Indian secret service RAW, established in 1968, one finds that despite having played a pivotal role in the creation of Bangladesh, the Indian secret agency never had a plan to annex it with India.

It also could not prevent Shaikh Mujib-ur-Rahman from being killed, even though it had prior knowledge of the plot.

It was RAW, which had supported the 1975 Emergency proclaimed by the then Indian Premier Indira Gandhi.

History later proved that this Emergency was a fatal mistake and that RAW had been giving Indira Gandhi wrong estimates about her public support and popularity.

During the Operation Blue Star against the Sikhs in June 1984, RAW failed again as it could not assess the strength of Sikh commander Bhindranwale’s forces at the Golden Temple in Amritsar. What was thought to be a five-hour operation later stretched to five days and tanks had to be brought in by the Indian Army to crush the rebellion.

This resulted in heavy casualties for the Army, courtesy incorrect RAW estimates.

Indira Gandhi had to pay a heavy price later and was gunned down by her Sikh bodyguards in 1983.

Despite having invested heavily to ensure that Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam continued as the Prime Minister of Mauritius in 1982, the Indian government had to face a lot of embarrassment as RAW had failed to deliver.

Known to have trained and funded the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, RAW could not prevent former Indian Premier Rajiv Gandhi from becoming a victim of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam in a village near Chennai in May 1991.

Former Soviet Union’s pride, the KGB (Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti) or the Committee for State Security was established in 1954.

It was the largest secret police and foreign-intelligence organisation in the world at its peak. It once had more than 480,000 personnel working for it.

Every Soviet leader had depended on the KGB for information, surveillance and control of the public.

While the KGB is vehemently blamed for the collapse of Soviet Union in 1991, its second biggest blunder was “Operation INFEKTION,” which was aimed at circulating disinformation that the United States was intentionally spreading AIDS around the world.

Dubbing it an American biological weapon, the Soviets had been propagating for over a decade that the US was planning to kill the world through AIDS.

But in 1992, the then Russian intelligence chief and later Prime Minister Yevgeni Primakov, admitted that the KGB was responsible for all the rumour mongering in this connection.

He said on record that the Soviet KGB had actually concocted the false story that the AIDS virus had been created in a US military laboratory as a biological weapon.

TIME magazine in its February 13, 1989 edition writes: “No branch of the Soviet government has been so secretive – and so dreaded – as the Komitet Gosudarstvennoi Bezopasnosti (Committee for State Security), better known as the KGB. The world’s largest spy and state-security machine – the KGB – employs more than 500,000 people including thousands of agents abroad. The agency has long been the stuff of shadowy legend, its name synonymous with terror and its doors shut tightly to the public.”

In his famous 736-page book ‘The Sword and the Shield: The Mitrokhin Archive and the Secret History of the KGB’, author Christopher Andrew has also highlighted the deception, immoralities and murderous history of the KGB.

The KGB was dissolved when its chief, Colonel-General Vladimir Kryuchkov, used the KGB’s resources to aid the failed 1991 coup attempt to oust Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev.

On August 23, 1991 Colonel-General Kryuchkov was arrested and on November 6, 1991, the KGB officially ceased to exist.

After killing bin Laden codenamed “Geronimo”, US grills Pakistan

May 4, 2011

WASHINGTON – The United States warned it would probe how Osama bin Laden managed to live in undetected luxury in Pakistan, as gripping details emerged about the US commando raid that killed the Al-Qaeda kingpin.

Officials said DNA tests had proven conclusively that the man shot dead by US special forces in Abbottabad was indeed Osama bin Laden.

“We got him,” US President Barack Obama told his top lieutenants, who had gathered in the White House Situation Room to watch the dramatic operation unfold late Sunday, according to the New York Times.

The high tension gripping the room had finally been broken by confirmation relayed by CIA chief Leon Panetta that the status of bin Laden — codenamed “Geronimo” — was now “EKIA”: Enemy Killed in Action.

Of five people killed in the raid, Geronimo was identified as the tall, bearded nemesis of successive US administrations who inspired generations of jihadist fighters to take up arms against first the Soviets and then the West.

His death at the hands of helicopter-borne US Navy SEAL commandos was the climax of years of painstaking intelligence work that followed bin Laden from the mountains of Afghanistan to a palatial villa in a Pakistani garrison town.

Obama’s top anti-terror adviser John Brennan said it was “inconceivable” that bin Laden did not enjoy a support network in Pakistan, a nuclear-armed nation allied uneasily to the US-led war in neighboring Afghanistan.

After Sunday night’s public celebrations in New York and Washington, the mood among some US lawmakers turned angry amid demands to know how bin Laden lived undisturbed in a country that receives billions of dollars of US aid.

Leafy Abbottabad is home to the Pakistani equivalent of the West Point and Sandhurst military academies, is popular with retired military personnel and tourists alike, and lies just two hours’ drive north of Islamabad.

The commando operation, which officials said lasted less than 40 minutes, stormed a heavily fortified compound that stood out from other properties for its towering perimeter walls and smothering security.

But in a country where anti-US feeling runs strong and where conspiracy theories proliferate, not everyone was buying the US version of events.

“Nobody believes it. We’ve never seen any Arabs around here,” said Bashir Qureshi, 61, who lives a stone’s throw from where bin Laden was shot and whose windows were blown out in the raid.

“They (the US) said they had thrown his body to the sea! This is wrong, he was not here.”

US officials said bin Laden was buried at sea after Islamic rites on the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier, as many world leaders welcomed his demise but warned it did not mean the challenge from terror was over.

The Shumukh al-Islam forum, the online conduit for Al-Qaeda missives, issued a statement Tuesday decrying the world media for uncritically accepting the US announcement that bin Laden was dead, the SITE Monitoring Service reported.

But the statement did not contradict the reports or say outright that he may still be alive, according to a SITE translation.

With Pakistan’s main Taliban faction vowing vengeance, the United States said Tuesday it was closing its consulates in Lahore and Peshawar to the public until further notice.

The US State Department warned of the potential for reprisals against Americans, while the CIA’s Panetta said terrorist groups “almost certainly” would try to avenge bin Laden.

Leaders in both Afghanistan and India said bin Laden’s discovery so close to Islamabad vindicated their claims of double-dealing by Pakistan’s military and intelligence powerbrokers.

Writing in Tuesday’s Washington Post, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari defended his country against accusations it did not do enough to track down bin Laden, but made no direct comment on alleged intelligence failures.

“Although the events of Sunday were not a joint operation, a decade of cooperation and partnership between the United States and Pakistan led up to the elimination of Osama bin Laden as a continuing threat to the civilized world,” Zardari wrote in an opinion piece.

“We in Pakistan take some satisfaction that our early assistance in identifying an Al-Qaeda courier ultimately led to this day,” he said, without explaining how bin Laden came to live undetected in Abbottabad.

“He was not anywhere we had anticipated he would be, but now he is gone.”

The White House released a photo of Obama and key aides watching the action unfold in the Situation Room.

A casually dressed Obama was sitting to one side, staring intently at the screen. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had a hand over her mouth, while Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Vice President Joe Biden watched grim-faced.

Obama’s gruff anti-terror adviser Brennan, who hunted the Al-Qaeda mastermind for 15 years, described how “minutes passed like days” as the officials monitored the high-stakes operation.

In another sign of mistrust between Washington and Islamabad, Brennan said US officials did not notify Pakistan of the raid until its helicopters exited Pakistani airspace with bin Laden’s remains.

Hundreds late Monday took to the streets in Quetta, a city believed to be home to the Afghanistan Taliban’s ruling council, in Pakistan’s first rally to honor bin Laden, burning a US flag and chanting anti-US slogans.

Parliament biggest obstacle to economic reform: Sheikh

April 18, 2011

WASHINGTON: The biggest obstacle standing in the way of the government achieving its targets on fiscal reform is Parliament, said Finance Minister Abdul Hafeez Sheikh, in a meeting with the International Monetary Fundin Washington on Sunday.

The finance minister is in the US capital to hold discussion with the international lender to restore the suspended $11.3 billion loan program, which the IMF put on hold due to Islamabad’s inability to pass essential fiscal reforms, including an end to unaffordable subsidies and the deregulation of the energy sector.

Sheikh laid out the government’s efforts to raise its revenues and curb expenses in order to bring its fiscal deficit down to a more manageable 4.5 per cent of the total size of the economy. He highlighted the cases against over 4,000 commercial organisations which are still stuck in court.

The minister said that the government was cognisant of the need to be financially self-sustaining and committed to tax reform, including levying a value added tax, renamed the reformed general sales tax (RGST), but had not been able to overcome opposition in Parliament.

“We do not want to be dependent on external financial assistance. We want more trade, not aid,” said the finance minister, repeating a mantra that has been repeated often by the Zardari administration’s economic managers. “We want access to Western markets for Pakistani goods.”

In his meeting with US Undersecretary of State for Economic Affairs Robert Hormats, the minister came away with a US assurance of support for a time-limited trade concession deal offered to the country by the European Union as a means of helping Pakistan deal with the economic impact of the devastating 2010 summer floods.

The support, however, comes despite the failure of the Obama administration to surmount Congressional objections to a similar trade concession deal that was offered by the Bush administration.

The minister hinted that Pakistan may seek another IMF loan programme in order to close the gap between government revenues and expenditures. However, he also stated that Islamabad would soon begin repayments on the previous IMF loan program, which are scheduled to begin towards the end of 2012. This implies that the second loan program will be used to help pay off the first one.

Sources say that Pakistan faced tough questions from IMF officials on its failure to implement a reform agenda. Meetings between the two sides are expected to continue on Monday.

Meanwhile, the finance minister also met with his counterpart from Germany, Dick Niebel, who offered his country’s support for hydroelectric power projects and small dams in Pakistan.

We stand with Pakistan: Hillary Clinton

March 24, 2011

The Times of India

WASHINGTON: Greeting the people of Pakistan as it celebrates anniversary of Lahore Resolution that led to the creation of the country, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday said that United States stands with them.

“As you celebrate Pakistan Day, know that the United States stands with you,” Clinton said in a message issued on the occasion.

“I join President Obama and the people of the United States in congratulating the people of Pakistan as you celebrate the anniversary of the signing of the Lahore Resolution this March 23, which laid the foundation for the creation of Pakistan,” she said.
The US and Pakistan are united by shared values, common interests and mutual respect, she said.

“We are constantly striving for greater tolerance, to enforce the rule of law and uphold the principles of democracy in both our countries,” she added.

“As Mohammad Ali Jinnah said the story of Pakistan, its struggle and its achievement, is the very story of great human ideals, struggling to survive in the face of great odds and difficulties,” Clinton said.

“These words ring true today as Pakistan works to fulfill the vision of its founders,” Clinton said.

“We join the people of Pakistan in honoring these ideals and the valiant sacrifices the Pakistani people are making every day in the fight against violent extremism,” she said.

“We remember the message of hope, courage and confidence the Quaid-e-Azam expressed to the Pakistani people and we continue to support your efforts to strive for a more peaceful and prosperous Pakistan,” Clinton said. PTI LKJ.

After Davis release, CIA touts ‘healthy’ ties with ISI

March 18, 2011

WASHINGTON: The CIA said Wednesday it enjoyed a “healthy partnership” with Pakistan’s intelligence service after an American spy accused of murder was freed by Islamabad authorities.


CIA says relations between the spy services remained strong.

A Pakistan court on Wednesday released the CIA contractor, Raymond Davis, who was accused of double murder, after $2 million in blood money was paid to the families of the dead.

The case had prompted protests in Pakistan and aggravated strained relations between Washington and Islamabad, which had faced calls to stand up to its superpower ally and try Davis for murder.

The Central Intelligence Agency, however, said relations between the spy services remained strong, amid speculation that the case was a result of hostile machinations between the CIA and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency.

“The agency and our Pakistani counterparts have had a strong relationship for years. When issues arise, it’s our standing practice to work through them,” CIA spokesman George Little said in an email.

“That’s the sign of a healthy partnership – one that’s vital to both countries, especially as we face a common set of terrorist enemies.”

US authorities said Davis was protected by full diplomatic immunity, a claim refuted by the Pakistani government, and a decision on his status was on Monday deferred by the Lahore high court for criminal judges to decide.

A third Pakistani was struck down and killed by a US diplomatic vehicle that raced to Davis’ assistance in the incident.

US officials have said Pakistan’s intelligence agency retains ties to some militiant groups, including the Haqqani network which is blamed for attacks on NATO-led troops in Afghanistan.

The chair of the US Senate Intelligence Committee, Dianne Feinstein, has reportedly described CIA ties with Pakistan intelligence as “something less than wholehearted partnership” and that the ISI is “walking both sides of the street.”


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.